apsis-book/content/concepts/orbit/maneuvers.md

133 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown

---
title: Orbit manoeuvres
tags: maneuvers, impulse, finite-burn, hohmann, delta-v
summary: How a change in orbit is made, what it costs in propellant, and why the cheapest transfer between two circular orbits is the one everybody uses.
---
# Orbit manoeuvres
A manoeuvre changes an orbit. The satellite is at one point on a closed curve and
must end up at another point on a different closed curve, and the change has to
be paid for in propellant. This is the subject: how large the change is, how
much it costs, and how the cost changes when the orbit is not circular.
## Definition
A **delta-v** is the magnitude of a change in velocity. A manoeuvre is planned
as a sequence of delta-v, and the propellant cost follows from their sum by the
rocket equation.
An **impulse** applies the whole change in zero time. It is the right model for
a burn that is short compared with the orbital period, which for a low Earth
orbit means anything under a minute.
A **finite burn** applies a thrust over a duration long enough that the
satellite moves while thrusting. The distinction is not academic: a low Earth
orbital transfer assisted by electric propulsion can last for hours and its
gravity loss is a substantial fraction of the ideal cost.
## Mathematics
### The rocket equation
The velocity a vehicle can produce depends on the exhaust velocity of its
propellant and on the mass ratio,
```text
delta_v = v_e * ln (m_0 / m_f)
```
with `v_e` the exhaust velocity. Since a logarithmic function grows slowly,
doubling the propellant gives far less than double the velocity. This is why
the delta-v of a mission is the primary constraint on its design, and why
staging exists.
### The Hohmann transfer
Between two coplanar circular orbits the cheapest two-impulse transfer is the
Hohmann transfer. The first burn raises or lowers the apoapsis to match the
target, the satellite coasts through half a revolution, and the second burn
circularises.
With `r_1`, `r_2` the two radii and `a_t = (r_1 + r_2) / 2` the transfer
semi-major axis, the two burns follow from the vis-viva equation,
```text
delta_v_1 = sqrt( mu (2/r_1 - 1/a_t) ) - sqrt( mu / r_1 )
delta_v_2 = sqrt( mu / r_2 ) - sqrt( mu (2/r_2 - 1/a_t) )
```
and the coast takes half the period of the transfer ellipse,
```text
t_coast = pi sqrt( a_t^3 / mu )
```
A raise from 300 km to geostationary costs about 4.1 km/s, which is a
large fraction of what a launch vehicle can provide, and most of it is the
first burn.
### Plane changes
A transfer that also changes inclination is more expensive than a coplanar
one. The combined manoeuvre, raising the apoapsis and rotating the plane at
the same time, costs more than doing either alone. The optimum for a given
radius change and a given inclination change is a two-burn sequence in which
the plane change is made at the smaller radius, where the velocity is lowest
and therefore the same angular rotation is cheapest in delta-v.
```text
delta_v_plane ~ V * 2 sin( inclination change / 2 )
```
with `V` the circular speed at the radius where the rotation is performed.
### Finite burns
Over a finite burn the satellite is still moving against gravity and the
thrust does not act along the instantaneous velocity. The achieved velocity
change is less than the ideal `a * t`, and the shortfall is the gravity loss,
```text
gravity loss = | delta_v_ideal | - | delta_v_achieved |
```
which grows with burn duration. A chemical burn is short enough to ignore it.
An electric thruster is not.
## Unit conventions
- Delta-v and velocity in kilometres per second.
- Radii in kilometres.
- The gravitational parameter `mu` in cubic kilometres per second squared.
- Inclinations in radians; degrees hide a factor of about 57 when used in a
sine.
## Applicability
The Hohmann transfer is optimal only for coplanar circular orbits, and only
among two-impulse transfers. Real missions are rarely that: the orbits are
elliptical, inclined, or both, and a bi-elliptic transfer can beat Hohmann
when the ratio of the two radii exceeds about 11.94, at the cost of a much
longer flight.
The impulsive model is adequate when the burn is a small fraction of the
orbital period. It is not adequate for a spiral orbit raise by electric
propulsion, where the "burn" is the whole mission.
A plane change is rarely worth it. Raising the inclination to reach a
different ground track costs delta-v proportional to the inclination and
often exceeds the entire launch budget, which is why planes are chosen at
launch and then maintained rather than changed.
## Standards
- Hohmann transfer: derived from the vis-viva equation; see Vallado,
*Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications*
- Rocket equation: Tsiolkovsky, 1903
## See also
- [[keplerian-elements]] for the orbit being changed
- [[sgp4]] for propagating the result of a manoeuvre
- [[perturbations]] for what the propellant estimate omits