--- title: Visibility, access and obstruction tags: visibility, access, elevation, horizon, obstruction, availability summary: The difference between a satellite being overhead and a user being able to use it, and what the gap between them is called. --- # Visibility, access and obstruction A satellite in view is not a satellite in use. The distinction is the difference between coverage and availability, and almost every disappointing service is explained by it. ## Definition **Visibility** is the geometric condition: the satellite is above the local horizon. **Access** is the condition that includes the link: the elevation is high enough for the link to close, the pointing can be resolved, and the propagation is acceptable. **Availability** is the fraction of the time an access is available to a particular user. **Obstruction** is anything in the way: terrain, a building, another vehicle, and in the worst case the payload of a satellite in a higher orbit passing across the line of sight. ## Mathematics ### The geometric pass A satellite in a circular orbit at semi-major axis `a` passes a latitude `phi` with a maximum elevation `e_max` that follows from the geometry, ```text e_max such that the elevation is arctan of the perpendicular distance from the observer to the orbit plane, divided by the distance along the line of sight ``` with two limits worth naming. At the pole a satellite in an inclined orbit reaches only `90 - inclination` degrees of elevation at best, so a high-inclination constellation has poor coverage at high latitude from any single satellite, and relies on many satellites rather than on high ones. At the equator a satellite in an equatorial orbit passes directly overhead and the elevation approaches 90 degrees, which is the best case in the system. ### The elevation mask The link budget requires a minimum elevation because below it the path length grows, the pointing becomes coarse, and the Doppler rate becomes large enough that tracking is harder. The mask is a design parameter rather than a physical one, and choosing a lower mask increases coverage and degrades the link on every pass, which is a trade rather than a free choice. ### Obstruction and its statistics Terrestrial obstruction is binary for a ground user, so the relevant figure is a **probability of availability** rather than an average. For a satellite obstruction, the relevant figure is the probability that an intersection occurs during an access, which depends on the relative motion and on the angular separation of the two orbits. ## Unit conventions - Elevation and azimuth in degrees when describing a pass, radians in any computation. - Access time in seconds; availability as a fraction or as a percentage. - Angles of separation in degrees. ## Applicability The gap between coverage and availability is large and is usually the whole story of a service complaint. A constellation may have 100 percent geometric coverage over a country and a service that is available for 96 percent of the time, and the remaining four percent is what a user remembers. The obstruction term is what makes the ground segment matter. The same constellation with a different set of ground station sites has a different availability, and no amount of satellites moves it, because the obstruction is local. A low elevation mask raises the headline coverage number and lowers the per-pass link margin at the same time. Those two effects are usually not reported together, which is why a coverage figure without a mask is not interpretable. ## Standards - Elevation mask conventions and availability reporting: not standardised; the relevant practice is the regulatory service definition in the licensing. ## See also - [[constellations]] for the coverage figure this is measured against - [[link-budget]] for why the mask is not zero - [[handover-and-routing]] for what happens between accesses